|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Real gains but practical limitations to glycaemic control with insulin in type 2 diabetes
Stephen Gardner
Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, UK
Susanna J Dunachie
Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
Jonathan C Levy
Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK, jonathan.levy{at}drl.ox.ac.uk
Background
Insulin is increasingly used for type 2 diabetes when oral therapy is inadequate. We have examined the results in unselected patients in a UK hospital diabetes clinic.
Methods
Clinical database records from 1994 to 2002 were analysed for anthropomorphic data, blood pressure, HbA1C and plasma cholesterol in type 2 diabetic patients starting insulin therapy.
Results
In 335 patients, HbA 1C at four years correlated positively with HbA1C before starting insulin (r=0.31, p<0.01) and negatively correlated with age at the time of starting insulin (r=-0.19, p<0.01). In two cohorts changed to insulin therapy before and after publication of the results of the UKPDS (1998), HbA1C improved in the first year, with little subsequent change over four years, while weight continued to rise. The later cohort had a significantly greater reduction in HbA1C (p=0.001). Even in this group, only 21.6% of patients achieved HbA1C < 7.5%.
Conclusions
In a UK diabetes clinic, insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes improved glycaemic control in the first year, but not thereafter, while weight gain continued in subsequent years. Tighter targets may have promoted improved results.
Key Words: type 2 diabetes insulin therapy HbA1C.
References
- UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998;352:837-53.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- National Institute of Clinical Excellence. Management of type 2 diabetes. Inherited Clinical Guideline G 2002.
- Basu A., Dean J. Are we achieving good glycaemic control quickly enough in patients with type 2 diabetes? (Abstract). Diabet Med 2001;18:S2:84.
- Song A., Brown P. Is it effective for all type 2 diabetic patients? (Abstract). Diabet Med 2001;18:S2:84.
- Wolffenbuttel BH, Sels JP, Rondas-Colbers GJ, Menheere PP Prognostic factors for successful insulin therapy in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Neth J Med 1999;54(2):63-9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ 2000;321:405-12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Abraira C., Colwell JA, Nuttall FQ et al. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on glycemic control and complications in type II diabetes (VA CSDM). Results of the feasibility trial. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study in Type II Diabetes. Diabetes Care 1995;18:1113-23.[Abstract]
- Wright A., Burden AC, Paisey RB, Cull CA, Holman RR Sulfonylurea inadequacy: efficacy of addition of insulin over 6 years in patients with type 2 diabetes in the U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS 57). Diabetes Care 2002;25:330-6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Yki-Jarvinen H., Ryysy L., Nikkila K., Tulokas T., Vanamo R., Heikkila M. Comparison of bedtime insulin regimens in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:389-96.
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, Vol. 4, No. 2,
98-102 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/14746514040040020601

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|