Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, S. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reviews

Review: The epidemic of diabetic renal disease — the practical challenges for renal replacement programmes

Simon J Davies

Department of Nephrology, North Staffordshire Hospitals Trust, Princes Road, Hartshill, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 7LN, UK, SimonDavies1{at}compuserve.com

Diabetic patients represent the largest group requiring renal replacement therapy in the developed nations, although take-on rates in the UK still lag behind other countries. As a group, diabetic patients present specific challenges to those providing renal replacement, including disproportionate late referral and under-recognition of renal insufficiency, multiple co-morbidity, and issues relating to choice of dialysis modality and when dialysis should be started. This review explores these issues and argues that it is by concentrating on the pre-dialysis phase of care that clinicians are most likely to achieve a more favourable clinical outcome. In addition to the benefits of good blood pressure and diabetic control, time is needed to inform and educate the patient prior to dialysis, and to evaluate co-morbidity if transplantation is to be considered. To achieve this, patients require nephrological supervision in the context of a well-resourced, multidisciplinary pre-dialysis programme, commencing a minimum of one year before starting renal replacement therapy.

Key Words: co-morbidity • multi-professional care • patient education • dialysis modality • late referral.

References

  • Ritz E., Tarng DC Renal disease in type 2 diabetes. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001;16(S5):11-18.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • UK Renal Registry Report 2000: Bristol, UK Renal Registry.
  • Raine AE Epidemiology, development and treatment of end-stage renal failure in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients in Europe. Diabetologia 1993;36:1099-104.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Arora P., Obrador GT, Ruthazer R. et al. Prevalence, predictors, and consequences of late nephrology referral at a tertiary care center. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999;10:1281-6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Levin A. Consequences of late referral on patient outcomes. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000;15(S3):8-13.[Free Full Text]
  • Goodkin DA, Mapes DL, Held PJ The dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study (DOPPS): how can we improve the care of hemodialysis patients? Semin Dial 2001;14:157-9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Crook ED, Harris J., Oliver B. et al. Endstage renal disease owing to diabetic nephropathy in Mississippi: an examination of factors influencing renal survival in a population prone to late referral. J Investig Med 2001;49:284-91.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Maynard C., Cordonnier D. The late referral of diabetic patients with kidney insufficiency to nephrologists has a high human and financial cost: interdisciplinary communication is urgently needed. Diabetes Metab 2001;27:517-21.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB et al. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:461-70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Merkus MP, Jager KJ, Dekker FW et al. Predictors of poor outcome in chronic dialysis patients: The Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis. The NECOSAD Study Group. Am J Kidney Dis 2000;35:69-79.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Khan IH, Campbell MK, Cantarovich D. et al. Survival on renal replacement therapy in Europe: is there a 'centre effect'? Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996;11:300-07.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Fried L., Bernardini J., Piraino B. A comparison of the Charlson comorbidity index and the Davies score to predict outcomes in incident PD patients. Perit Dial Int 2001;21:S22.
  • Davies SJ, Philipps L., Naish PF et al. Quantifying comorbidity in Peritoneal Dialysis patients and its relationship to other predictors of survival. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002;(in press).
  • NKF-DOQI clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis adequacy. National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis 1997;30(S2):S67-136.
  • Churchill DN, Taylor DW, Keshaviah PR Adequacy of dialysis and nutrition in continuous peritoneal dialysis: association with clinical outcome. J Am Soc Nephrol 1996;7:198-207.[Abstract]
  • Churchill DN An evidence-based approach to earlier initiation of dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1997;30:899-906.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Korevaar JC, Jansen MA, Dekker FW et al. When to initiate dialysis: effect of proposed US guidelines on survival. Lancet 2001;358:1046-50.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Moist LM, Port FK, Orzol SM et al. Predictors of loss of residual renal function among new dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000;11:556-64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Singhal MK, Bhaskaran S., Vidgen E. et al. Rate of decline of residual renal function in patients on continuous peritoneal dialysis and factors affecting it. Perit Dial Int 2000;20:429-38.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Fenton SSA, Schaubel DE, Desmeules M. et al. Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: a comparison of adjusted mortality rates. Am J Kidney Dis 1997;30:334-42.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Heaf JG, Lokkegaard H., Madsen M. Initial survival advantage of PD relative to HD. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001;16:A161.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Collins AJ, Hao W., Xia H. et al. Mortality risks of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1999;34:1065-74.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Merkus MP, Jager KJ, Dekker FW et al. Physical symptoms and quality of life in patients on chronic dialysis: results of The Netherlands Cooperative Study on Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD). Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999;14:1163-70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Van Biesen W., Vanholder RC, Veys N. et al. An evaluation of an integrative care approach for end-stage renal disease patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000;11:116-25.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Vonesh EF, Moran J. Mortality in end-stage renal disease: a reassessment of differences between patients treated with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999;10:354-65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Klang B., Bjorvell H., Clyne N. Predialysis education helps patients choose dialysis modality and increases disease-specific knowledge. J Adv Nurs 1999;29:869-76.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Breckenridge DM Patients' perceptions of why, how, and by whom dialysis treatment modality was chosen. Anna J 1997;24:313-19; discussion 320-21.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Szabo E., Moody H., Hamilton T. et al. Choice of treatment improves quality of life. A study on patients undergoing dialysis. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:1352-6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Rasgon SA, Chemleski BL, Ho S. et al. Benefits of a multidisciplinary predialysis program in maintaining employment among patients on home dialysis. Adv Perit Dial 1996;12:132-5.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Levin A., Lewis M., Mortiboy P. et al. Multidisciplinary predialysis programs: quantification and limitations of their impact on patient outcomes in two Canadian settings. Am J Kidney Dis 1997;29:533-40.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, Vol. 2, No. 2, 86-89 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/14746514020020020401


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, S. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?