This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Miyazaki, Y. Articles by Defronzo, R. A Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Predictors of improved glycaemic control with rosiglitazone therapy in type 2 diabetic patients: a practical approach for the primary care physician

Elena De Filippis

Mandeep Bajaj

Estela Wajcberg

Leonard Glass

Curtis Triplitt

Eugenio Cersosimo

Lawrence J Mandarino

Ralph A Defronzo

University of Texas Health Science Center, Diabetes Division, Room 3.380S, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, Texas, 78229-3900, USA, albarado{at}uthscsa.edu

Objective — To determine predictors of improved glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus during rosiglitazone therapy using basic clinical parameters that are readily available in daily clinical practice. Research design and methods — Thirty-seven type 2 diabetic patients (men/women = 18/19; age = 54±2years; diabetes duration = 6±1 years; diet-/sulphonylurea-treated = 24/13) received a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and determination of body fat before and after rosiglitazone (8 mg/day) for 12 weeks. Results — After rosiglitazone therapy, there were decreases in HbA1C (8.6±0.2 to 7.2±0.2%, p<0.0001), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (10.6±0.3 to 8.0±0.3 mmol/L [191±6 to 145±6 mg/dL], p<0.0001), fasting plasma insulin (FPI) (108±6 to 84±6 pmol/L [18±1 to 14±µU/ml], p<0.05), fasting free fatty acids (FFA) (760±39 to 611±33 µEq/l, p<0.05), mean plasma glucose (PG) — OGTT (16.2±0.39 to 12.7±0.33 mmol/L [291±7 to 230±6 mg/dL], p<0.001), and mean FFA-OGTT (604±27 to 445±23 µEq/l, p<0.01) despite increases in body weight (85±2 to 88±2 kg, p<0.01) and % fat mass (37.9±2.0 to 39.5±1.9%, p<0.01). The insulinogenic index (IGI) during 0—120 minutes OGTT (IGI₀-120) increased following rosiglitazone (0.19±0.03 to 0.30±0.05, p<0.01). Two different insulin sensitivity indices, calculated from PG and plasma insulin (PI) during OGTT, increased significantly: composite index of whole body insulin sensitivity (ISIcomposite): 2.3±0.3 to 3.4±0.4, p<0.05; oral glucose insulin sensitivity (OGIS): 248±5 to 294±6 ml/m^2.min, p<0.001. Using clinical and laboratory variables obtained in daily clinical practice (age, gender, diabetes duration, sulphonylurea treatment, body mass index (BMI), % fat mass, fasting plasma insulin/C-peptide/FFA/lipids, IGI0-30, IGI0-120, and ISIcomposite or OGIS), stepwise regression analysis demonstrated that % fat mass (standard coefficient (S.C.) = —0.49, p=0.001) and OGIS (S.C. = 0.31, p=0.02) or ISIcomp (S.C. = 0.31, p=0.03) are significant predictors of the decrease in HbA1C after rosiglitazone (adjusted R² =0.33, p=0.0004). Conclusions — Rosiglitazone improves insulin resistance and glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes. Obesity (more body fat mass) and reduced insulin sensitivity prior to treatment are the best predictors of glycaemic response to thiazolidinedione therapy in type 2 diabetes.

Key Words: type 2 diabetes mellitus • rosiglitazone • glycaemic control • insulin sensitivity.

The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, Vol. 5, No. 1, 28-35 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/14746514050050010601


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?