Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heinemann, L.
Right arrow Articles by Heise, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Reviews

Review: Current status of the development of inhaled insulin

Lutz Heinemann

Profil Institute for Metabolic Research GmbH, Hellersbergstr 9, 41460 Neuss, Germany, Lutz.Heinemann{at}profil-research.de

Tim Heise

The most promising alternative route of insulin administration seems to be pulmonary delivery by inhalation. For a maximal rate of absorption insulin must be applied deep into the lung, i.e., into the alveoli. A number of inhalers designed to generate an aerosol with an appropriate particle size for pulmonary delivery are currently in clinical development. The pharmacodynamic effects of insulin formulations administered via the lung are comparable to, or are even faster than, those of subcutaneously injected regular insulin or rapid-acting insulin analogues. The relative biopotency of inhaled insulin is approximately 10%, i.e., the dose of inhaled insulin must be 10 times higher than the dose applied subcutaneously in order to induce a comparable metabolic effect. Clinical trials indicate that metabolic control with this pain free route of insulin administration is at least comparable to that of subcutaneous (sc) insulin therapy. Side effects. observed in human trials, gave rise to safety concerns that have delayed development for several years. Nevertheless, recent long-term safety studies indicate that the increased stimulation of insulin antibody formation stopped after some time and that the observed changes in lung function were minor or reversible. Consequently the first application for an approval of pulmonary insulin has been submitted to the authorities. In summary, it seems as if, after several decades of research, for the first time a feasible alternative route for insulin administration is within Reach.

Key Words: inhaled/inhalative insulin • inhalers • alternative route of insulin administration • lung • risks • bioavailability • biopotency • variability • diabetes.

The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, Vol. 4, No. 5, 295-301 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/14746514040040050201


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?