Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mcinnes, G. T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

`Size is not everything`: the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering treatment to prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)

The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomised to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker versus diuretic. The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering treatment to prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)

Gordon T Mcinnes

University of Glasgow, Division of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, G11 6NT, UK, University of Glasgow, Division of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, G11 6NT, UK

ALLHAT, the largest ever antihypertensiv e trial, compared cardiac outcomes in 42,418 high-risk individuals with mild-to-moderate hypertension, including 36% with diabetes, randomised to: 1) the thiazide-type diuretic, chlorthalidone; or 2) the ACE inhibitor, lisinopril; or 3) the calcium channel blocker, amlodipine. No differences between the groups were observed for the primary outcome coronary heart disease (CHD) but chlorthalidone was superior in preventing some cardiovascular disease events. Since diuretics are less expensive, it might be inferred that these drugs should be the preferred first-line antihypertensive therapy. However, the design and conduct of ALLHAT make interpretation of the results difficult. Despite its size, ALLHAT has few practical implications for management of hypertension.

Key Words: ACE inhibitor • amlodipine • calcium channel blocker • chlorthalidone • lisinopril • thiazide-type diuretic.

The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, Vol. 3, No. 4, 263-267 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/14746514030030040501


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular DiseaseHome page
J. R Petrie and M. Kirby
Too much of a good thing: 2004 guidance from NICE and BHS-IV on hypertension in diabetes
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, November 1, 2004; 4(6): 365 - 368.
[PDF]