Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dormandy, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The need for outcome studies in type 2 diabetes

John Dormandy

Clinical Research Centre, Vascular Division,1st Floor Ingleby House, St Georges Hospital Medical School, Blackshaw Road, University of London, London, SW17 0QT, UK, dormandyjohn{at}aol.com

Outcome studies use primary end points such as overall mortality or major morbidity to demonstrate that treatments deliver meaningful clinical benefits. Historically it was thought that most of the cardiovascular morbidity due to diabetes was related to microvascular disease, providing a marker for macrovascular disease. In diabetes an outcome study would measure all-cause death, cardiac death and cardiovascular morbidity (end points related to macrovascular disease), whereas conventional trials in diabetes have used surrogate end points, such as blood pressure, microvascular disease (retinopathy, nephropathy) or glycaemic control, which may not predict clinical benefits in the prevention of macrovascular end points. Although outcome trials are increasingly required by regulatory or funding agencies, few have been performed in diabetes; most data have come from trials with surrogate end points or subgroup analyses of cardiovascular outcome trials. Methodological constraints, particularly the large patient populations and long follow-up required, partly explain the lack of outcome studies in diabetes.

The PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events (PROactive) is a macrovascular outcome study in patients with type 2 diabetes. It will involve approximately 4,000 patients who will receive pioglitazone or placebo in addition to their existing therapy. Principal end points will be all-cause mortality and severe disability due to macrovascular complications. PROactive should provide important data on the impact of therapy on the incidence of cardiovascular complications in type 2 diabetes.

Key Words: clinical trials • diabetes • drug therapy • morbidity • mortality • pioglitazone.

The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, Vol. 2, No. 1 suppl, S32-S36 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/14746514020020010801


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?